Des 49 noms fournis par alobee, 24 font partie d'une liste de 25 signataires qui ont tout simplement signé une lettre adressée au Congrès américain le 13 septembre 2004. Nous examinerons un peu plus loin la véritable nature de cette lettre.
Je préfère commencer par l'examen d'un des noms figurant sur la liste de alobee mais ne figurant pas sur la liste des signataires. Voici pourquoi...
Un certain Ekosys et moi avons eu récemment
une petite prise de bec à propos du statut d'expert du Maj. Rokke, Douglas - Director U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project.
Rokke est un physicien, spécialiste de l'étude des rapports entre santé et uranium appauvri. Je ne conteste absolument pas son expertise dans ce domaine mais les parano-ploucs lui ont bien sûr attribué d'urgence le statut d'expert en missile. Il est partisan de la thèse du missile au Pentagone.
Seulement y a un os...et un gros...
Parlant du Major Douglas Rokke...
Ekosys a écrit:
...Lui donne pas d'argument, y dis juste, c'est mon job de reperer les sites d'impacts j'en est vue de toute sorte et celle du pentagone c'est un missile j'en suis sur....
C'est vrai ! Voici d'ailleurs la déclaration du Major Rokke:
Citer:
When you look at the whole thing, especially the crash site void of airplane parts, the size of the hole left in the building and the fact the projectile's impact penetrated numerous concrete walls, it looks like the work of a missile," said Maj. Rokke from his Rantoul, IL home this week. "And when you look at the damage, it was obviously a missile.
Mais du même souffle le Major Rokke poursuit en disant:Citer:
Also, if you look at the WTC and the disturbing flash hitting the tower right before the impact of the airplane, it also looks like a missile was used."
Voir ce lien -->
Bref, Rokke voit des missiles partout, même au WTCSon "
degré d'expertise" va jusque là...
Avouez que c'est émouvant !
alobee a écrit:
...Voici un liste des gens qui se sont déjà prononé soit comme était un complot de l'intérieur des EU ou encore que la comisison du 9-11 était un écran de fumé ou que la question était trop grave qu'une enquête indépendante doit être demandé.
...
Bon...Et la lettre ?
Parmi les signataires de cette lettre au congrès américain, plusieurs noms (24), figurent sur la liste "alobique".
Mais au fait, de quel genre de lettre s'agit-il ?
Soupir
Il ne s'agit pas, comme alobee semble vouloir le claironner, de "...complot...écran de fumée...trop grave...enquête indépendante..." mais d'une lettre mêlant à la fois recommandations et reproches au congrès américain.
Il faut tout l'aveuglement missionnaire du plouc diplômé pour y trouver la "preuve" de l'existence d'un complot/écran_de_fumée...
Bon, résumé: 26 recherches --> 26 conneries.
Ras le bol. Quelques extraits:
l'ensemble (25) des signataires de la lettre a écrit:
...call upon Congress to refrain from narrow political considerations and to apply brakes to the race to implement the commission recommendations. It is not too late for Congress to break with the practice of limiting testimony to that from politicians and top-layer career bureaucrats—many with personal reputations to defend and institutional equities to protect. Instead, use this unique opportunity to introduce salutary reform, an opportunity that must not be squandered by politically driven haste...
...
The report simply does not get at key problems within the intelligence, aviation security, and law enforcement communities. The omission of such serious and applicable issues and information by itself renders the report flawed, and casts doubt on the validity of many of its recommendations...
...
We believe that one of the primary purposes of the Commission was to establish
accountability; that to do so is essential to understanding the failures that led to 9/11, and
to prescribe needed changes. However, the Commission in its report holds no one
accountable, stating instead “our aim has not been to assign individual blame”. That is to
play the political game, and it shows that the goal of achieving unanimity overrode one of
the primary purposes of this Commission’s establishment. When calling for
accountability, we are referring not to quasi-innocent mistakes caused by “lack of
imagination” or brought about by ordinary “human error”. Rather, we refer to intentional
actions or inaction by individuals responsible for our national security, actions or inaction
dictated by motives other than the security of the people of the United States. The report
deliberately ignores officials and civil servants who were, and still are, clearly negligent
and/or derelict in their duties to the nation. If these individuals are protected rather than
held accountable, the mindset that enabled 9/11 will persist, no matter how many layers
of bureaucracy are added, and no matter how much money is poured into the agencies.
Character counts. Personal integrity, courage, and professionalism make the difference.
Only a commission bent on holding no one responsible and reaching unanimity could
have missed that...
Cette lettre - sous format PDF - de 3 pages, vous pouvez la télécharger
en suivant ce lien
Liste des signataires:
1. Castello, Edward J. Jr., Former Special Agent, FBI
2. Cole, John M., Former Veteran Intelligence Operations Specialist, FBI
3. Conrad, David "Mark", Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs
4. Dew, Rosemary N., Former Supervisory Special Agent, Counterterrorism &
Counterintelligence, FBI
5. Dzakovic, Bogdan, Former Red Team Leader, FAA
6. Edmonds, Sibel D., Former Language Specialist, FBI
7. Elson, Steve, Retired Navy Seal & Former Special Agent, FAA & US Navy
8. Forbes, David, Aviation, Logistics and Govt. Security Analysts, BoydForbes, Inc.,
9. Goodman, Melvin A., Retired Senior Analyst/ Division Manager & senior fellow at the
Center for International Policy, CIA
10. Graf, Mark, Former Security Supervisor, Planner, & Derivative Classifier,
Department of Energy
11. Graham, Gilbert M., Retired Special Agent, Counterintelligence, FBI
12. Kleiman, Diane, Former Special Agent, US Customs
13. Kwiatkowski, Lt Col Karen U., Veteran Policy Analyst, USAF-DoD
14. Larkin, Lynne A., Former Operation Officer, CIA
15. MacMichael, David, Former Senior Estimates Officer, CIA
16. McGovern, Raymond L., Veteran Analyst, CIA
17. Pahle, Theodore J. Senior Intelligence Officer (Ret), Defense Intelligence Agency,
Office of Naval Intelligence, and U.S. Army Intelligence
18. Sarshar, Behrooz, Retired Language Specialist, FBI
19. Sullivan, Brian F., Retired Special Agent & Risk Management Specialist, FAA
20. Tortorich, Larry J., Retired US Naval Officer, US Navy & Dept. of Homeland
Security/TSA
21. Turner, Jane A., Retired Special Agent, FBI
22. Vincent, John B., Retired Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBI
23. Whitehurst, Dr. Fred, Retired Supervisory Special Agent/Laboratory Forensic
Examiner, FBI
24. Wright, Col. Ann, Retired Reserve Colonel & Former US Diplomat, US Army,
25. Zipoli, Matthew J., Special Response Team (SRT) Officer, DOE
Connexion
Inscription
Denis
