Effectivement, le premier cas & cliché n'est pas intéressant du tout, d'autant plus qu'il est précisé :
Citer:
We do not even know if the photographer saw something
unusual to photograph
Quand au deuxième cas :
Citer:
he sighted an ovoid object, white in color, moving to the west and, judging by the
position of its shadow, very close to the ground.The observation of pilot Hoffmann was corroborated by several witnesses from Diamante city, in the neighboring province of Entre Ríos, who several minutes before 15:30 hours affirm having sighted an object of similar features to the one photographed, shifting towards the west.
mais :
Citer:
Yes, there is a shadow which at first sight appears as though it might be cast by the white oblong blob in the picture, roughly in the right position considering the sun’s azimuth at that time, but it could also be the shadow of a tree hidden by the blob.
Un second cliché aurait sans doute permis de lever le doute :
Citer:
The examination of the second photograph would eliminate our doubts, but only one photograph was published in the reference book.
++
Buck
Connexion
Inscription
